Flipped Model in Higher Education Classroom Teaching and Learning
Introduction
Nowadays in
higher education there is much talk of MOOCS (Massive Open Online Courses),
e-learning, blended learning and the ‘FLIPPED’ (Flexible Environments, Learning
Culture, Intentional Content, Professional Educators, Progressive Activities, Engaging
Experiences, and Diversified Platforms) classroom; what does it mean, what are
the issues and solutions?
Brief Literature Review
One of the
first issues to be apparent is that ‘FLIPPED learning’ is under utilised and
even when utilised, there maybe sub-optimal delivery for good teaching and
learning outcomes (Chen et al., 2014). Conversely,
whether a fee-paying program, compulsory K12 or a MOOC, FLIPPED learning can
dramatically increase access (Hazlett, 2014).
Flipped
classroom is also a benefit to both teaching and learning, with students being
exposed to subject content online and participate in active lessons; moving
away from teacher directed pedagogy to student centred learning or andragogy
(especially important for transition of youth to adulthood). The benefits are exemplified by less homework
issues, question and answer, deeper exploration and those away with illness can
keep up. For teachers it means
supporting students in application, reusable, easier individual student
attention and more transparency for parents (Mihai, 2016).
Another
view includes the following benefits: more student control, student centred, content
more accessible for students or parents, and more efficient. However, this is tempered by disadvantages of
digital divide or illiteracy, requires significant preparation and front-end
input, not good for test preparation and increased screen time (Acedo, 2013).
Other
related concerns including potential side lining of teachers and their related
skills, online content and instructional design can be boring versus active and
interesting lessons, excusing bad pedagogy, internet access issues (e.g.
Australia has internet speed and bandwidth issues comparing with less developed
nations), assuring online content e.g. videos are watched, online content and
instructional design can be very time consuming (November & Mull, 2012).
What are the issues for FLIPPED model in adult vocation or higher education teaching and learning?
The obvious
issue is that when developed for K12 it is based upon pedagogic learning
theories for children and youth, supported by teachers with strong background
in theory and application of teaching, learning, assessment and
technology. However, this may not translate
well to adult education, vocational or higher education requiring skills of
applying andragogy i.e. matching adult learning styles with instructors,
trainers, teachers or lecturers lacking the same education background.
What are the differences between pedagogy and andragogy in teaching and learning?
Firstly, what
do adults bring to learning and how do they learn optimally as identified by Malcolm
Knowles? Knowles identified six principles
including internal motivation and self-direction, life experience and knowledge,
goal oriented, relevancy, practical and need for respect. Contrasted with pedagogy in the following table:
Advantages of Andragogy versus Pedagogy of FLIPPED Model in Higher Education Classroom Teaching |
(Education Technology &
Mobile Learning, 2018)
Reflection on issues and solutions
One has
experienced online blinded learning in higher education i.e. online MBA with
webinars, CPD (Continuing Professional Development) via e-learning platform and
vocational training certificate via distance learning and recorded webinars as
‘add-ons’.
Issues
encountered included lack of teaching, learning, assessment and technology
skills in instructional design, lesson planning, delivery of interesting
lessons, developing and testing activity resources, creating opportunities for
interactivity, involving all students (not just strong or dominant), using
existing or old lecture slides for content, technology breakdowns with no
disaster plan, not using or updating discussion forums and relying too much on
‘presenting’ versus teaching.
Solutions
could include CPD like ‘train the trainer’ or in Australia the TAE40116
Certificate IV Trainer & Assessor, however many are not suitable for adult
learners whether young or old. In more
diverse international cohorts where English is not the first language, adapt using
the Cambridge CELTA (Certificate to Teach English Language to Adults) framework
(applied qualification studied full time intensively four weeks including
practice and observations).
The latter
is especially well designed to include all learning theories including pedagogy
and importantly andragogy, for student centred communication interaction. It is based on the PPP model (Presentation,
Practice and Production), when applied well is active, interesting, with clear
learning outcomes and multi levelled hidden curriculum, in addition to
communication skills, when pitched at advanced or proficiency level students
(UCLES, 2018).
Nowadays
with empowered and fee paying adult learners, top down directed teaching and
learning of subject matter may neither be accepted nor acceptable?
Reference List:
Acedo, M.
(2013) 10 Pros and Cons of a Flipped
Classroom. Available at: https://www.teachthought.com/learning/10-pros-cons-flipped-classroom/ (Accessed on: 27 January 2018).
Chen, Y; Wang, Y; Kinshuk &
Chen, N. (2014) Is FLIP enough? Or
should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education. 79 pp. 16-27.
Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131514001559
Education Technology & Mobile Learning (2018) Awesome Chart on “Pedagogy versus Andragogy”. Available at: https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/05/awesome-chart-on-pedagogy-vs-andragogy.html
(Accessed on: 28 January 2018).
Hazlett, C.
(2014) Parallel Sessions: MOOC meets
Flipped Classroom. Available at: https://blog.edx.org/parallel-sessions-mooc-meets-flipped
(Accessed on: 27 January 2018).
Mihai, L.
(2016) Blended Learning: 8 Flipped
Classroom Benefits for Students and Teachers. Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/8-flipped-classroom-benefits-students-teachers
(Accessed on: 27 January 2018).
November,
A. & Mull, B. (2012) Flipped
Learning: A Response to Five Common Criticisms. Available at: http://web.uvic.ca/~gtreloar/Articles/Technology/flipped-learning-a-response-to-five-common-criticisms.pdf
(Accessed on: 27 January 2018).
UCLES
(2018) Cambridge English Teaching
Framework. Available at: http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/teaching-english/cambridge-english-teaching-framework/
(Accessed on: 27 January 2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment